With legalization on the horizon in many places, cannabis could accidentally reproduce a scenario other crops have faced for years: streamlining.

Bold improvements in yield, logistical efficiency, or waste reduction pressured chemical companies and seed makers to engineer fruits, vegetables, and grain that, in many cases, prioritize cash performance and profitability over the consumer’s experience.  Variety usually comes at a cost of some sort, and it’s no different in cannabis.

For instance, mother plants take up a significant amount of many grows budgets and space. For many crops, the number of commonly available cultivars has experienced a drastic reduction over the years, and today, the apples or tomatoes you find across the world are much less diverse than they were a few decades ago.

Notably, today’s fruits, vegetables, and cereal crops globally consumed are increasingly grown from patented varieties or cultivars. Many of them are Genetically Engineered (or GMOs), particularly cereals and grains. The cannabis landscape is currently rich with thousands of different varieties. In addition to the numerous landrace #0excludeGlossary, following an untold code of conduct. But in our bid for legalization, we’ve incidentally introduced a new threat: large corporations may start taking over cannabis genetics from the people who spent their entire lives building this industry.

And the same folks may facilitate the corporate takeover while trying to protect us against it.

 

Potential Impact of Patent-Driven Cannabis Production

Both the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have started granting patents on cannabis cultivars. We saw this happening with other plants before…should we expect a different outcome for cannabis?

Most, if not all, current cannabis cultivars are in the public domain and cannot get legal protection. Patents in the world of cannabis will likely make growers and farmers dependent upon large seed makers (usually chemical companies), having to comply with license agreements and probably even royalties.

Eventually, patents result in a locked genetic landscape, where innovation becomes rare and costly, and products eventually standardize. For exclusive rights over a plant (Plant Variety Protection, Plant Breeders Rights, or Plant Patent) to be granted, an applicant has to go through a certain process.

The cultivar cannot be considered to reside in the public domain, and there is a multitude of reasons that most cannabis varieties may not even be eligible. Additionally, the cost is not limited to application fees, but also includes lab tests, IP agent fees, and more.

Once you have your “patent“, you are obligated to challenge any infringement on your rights and therefore spend even more money, or else risk losing your patent. It’s financially and practically impossible to enforce your exclusive rights over multiple cultivars without some very significant capital.

And, as is the course of business, organizations innovating in a patent-driven industry tend to either absorb or get absorbed by other organizations, contributing to more concentration and streamlining. While breeders may continue to operate on the fringes, this scenario implies the demise of mainstream cannabis breeders.

Lastly, for a patented cultivar to be seen as economically viable, #3excludeGlossary need and want to enjoy the granted exclusive rights for as long as possible. Creativity and variety are the antitheses of this idea. If this becomes the norm, we may end up with a few hundred patented cultivars generating the lion’s share of profits for a few large corporations and fewer introductions of new phenotypes, resulting in limited consumer experiences and patient treatments.

Open-Source & Open-Innovation Of Cannabis Breeding

The cannabis breeding ecosystem, as we know it, one that by its organic and underground nature has managed to remain resiliently prolific, could be at stake today. The most commonly observed alternative is a concentrated #6excludeGlossary model.

Cannabis breeders considering patenting their plants may be doing the paperwork for corporate takeover. Can we invent a new model? A model that fosters creativity with an open innovation spirit, that values the concept of public domain creations over #7excludeGlossary restricted innovation.

An open innovation approach to breeding is probably critical for the cannabis industry to reach its full potential. Patients and consumers are strain-aware, which is why introducing new varieties is a must for producers, processors, and retailers to remain relevant in the market.

This can be achieved via an open approach fostering a balanced relationship between breeders, growers, patients, and consumers. In the cannabis industry, there are organizations working on defining an open-source cannabis breeding framework for breeders to freely use and formalize the informal collaborative model that led us to where we are today.

Below are some potential key terms of such an #10excludeGlossary framework:

If successful, the cannabis community could become a model inspiring all cannabis plant breeders across the world! Nothing less.

Let us know what you think.

Do NOT Grow Another Plant Until You've Enrolled Into This! 💯
Cannabis Horticulture
A Carefully Curated Cultivation "Crash Course" On Everything You Need To Crank Out High-Yielding, "Cannabis-Cup Winner" Flowers That'll Generate HUGE Crops All-Year Long
Crafting Cannabis-Infused Edibles Takes MORE Than Ingredients... 🍽️
Edible Cannabis Products (100% FREE Training)
Enthusiasts Face Challenges Navigating An Ever-Expanding Array Of Cannabis Products & Delivery Methods From "Raw Flower" Smoothies To Infused-Edibles, Cannabinoid-Based Drinks + MORE.